Forum teuk.org

πŸ” MB678-II β€” Partyline Sessions Get Their Own Chamber

in Mediabot Β· started by TeuK Β· 3d ago

TeuK Β· 3d ago

Mediabot v3 continues the progressive modularization of the historical Partyline subsystem.

After MB678-I moved the TCP/DCC transport layer into:

Mediabot/Partyline/Transport.pm

MB678-II extracts the next coherent responsibility from Mediabot/Partyline.pm:

Mediabot/Partyline/SessionAuth.pm

This round focuses specifically on session lifecycle and authentication.

The Partyline command dispatcher and the command implementations intentionally remain in Mediabot/Partyline.pm.

The goal remains the same as in MB678-I: establish one clean architectural boundary at a time, preserve the historical Partyline API, and avoid mixing unrelated refactors into a single commit.

πŸ—οΈ What moved

The new SessionAuth.pm module now owns the session/authentication responsibilities around:

  • authentication timeout cancellation;
  • session shutdown and cleanup;
  • reverse-DNS timeout handling;
  • asynchronous reverse-DNS scheduling;
  • display nickname resolution;
  • Partyline broadcasts;
  • Partyline chat broadcasts;
  • Telnet echo negotiation;
  • Telnet IAC stripping;
  • per-IP brute-force checks;
  • brute-force failure recording;
  • brute-force state cleanup;
  • login processing.

A total of 14 methods were extracted:

_cancel_auth_timeout
_close_session
_reverse_dns_timeout
_schedule_reverse_dns_lookup
_display_nick
_broadcast
_broadcast_chat
_telnet_echo_off
_telnet_echo_on
_strip_telnet_iac
_pl_bf_blocked
_pl_bf_record
_pl_bf_clear
_do_login

The historical Mediabot::Partyline method surface remains available through imports.

Existing callers therefore continue using the same API without needing to know that the implementation moved.

🧭 What deliberately did not move

One important decision in MB678-II was to leave:

_handle_line

inside Mediabot/Partyline.pm.

_handle_line sits directly on the boundary between the authentication state machine and the large Partyline command dispatcher.

Moving it together with Session/Auth would have blurred the new module boundary and mixed authentication work with the future command extraction.

So MB678-II keeps:

transport        β†’ Partyline/Transport.pm
session + auth   β†’ Partyline/SessionAuth.pm
dispatch         β†’ Partyline.pm
commands         β†’ Partyline.pm

This keeps the architecture explicit and leaves a clean starting point for the next Partyline round.

πŸ“ Structural result

Before MB678-II:

Mediabot/Partyline.pm            : 6041 lines
Mediabot/Partyline/Transport.pm  : 1012 lines

After MB678-II:

Mediabot/Partyline.pm              : 5426 lines
Mediabot/Partyline/Transport.pm    : 1012 lines
Mediabot/Partyline/SessionAuth.pm  :  676 lines

The central Partyline module therefore loses another 615 lines of session/auth implementation.

A dedicated extraction contract was added:

t/cases/863_mb678_partyline_session_auth_extraction.t

The previous MB678 transport contract was also adjusted so that it continues validating the intended architecture after the second extraction.

πŸ§ͺ Focused validation

MB678-II first went through targeted session/auth validation.

The exported-symbol contract was checked independently:

PASSED : 368/368

The focused Session/Auth suite then passed:

PASSED : 484/484  (3s)

This covered areas including:

  • Partyline login behaviour;
  • authentication timeout cleanup;
  • asynchronous reverse DNS;
  • per-IP brute-force protection;
  • brute-force state-map bounds;
  • configurable authentication policy;
  • idempotent session closure;
  • MB678-I transport compatibility;
  • the new MB678-II extraction contract.

🧩 A focused-test isolation trap

During the first combined focused run, 85_exported_symbols_resolve.t reported a large cascade of failures.

The cause was not MB678-II.

One of the earlier focused tests deliberately installs a minimal fake JSON package containing only:

encode_json

and marks JSON.pm as loaded in %INC.

When 85_exported_symbols_resolve.t later attempted to load AdminCommands.pm, that module also needed:

decode_json

The isolated test process therefore saw an intentionally incomplete fake JSON module.

Running the export contract independently confirmed the real state:

PASSED : 368/368

The Session/Auth focused suite without that artificial ordering issue also passed completely:

PASSED : 484/484

No runtime code change was required.

πŸ›‘οΈ Security audit

The Partyline authentication-throttling invariant previously assumed that all authentication code lived physically inside Partyline.pm.

MB678-II updates the audit so that the security contract follows the new module boundary.

The invariant itself remains unchanged and fail-closed.

Final result:

Verdict: GO β€” all 11 security invariants hold.

The audit continues to verify:

  • secret redaction;
  • DCC token masking;
  • TLS verification;
  • safe external command execution;
  • IRC output sanitisation;
  • single-instance locking;
  • HTTP download caps;
  • authentication throttling on both IRC and Partyline paths.

🌐 Real Partyline runtime validation

The development instance was restarted with the new Session/Auth module.

The Partyline listener remained available:

0.0.0.0:23456 LISTEN

A real TCP session was then opened against the running bot.

The first prompt was received normally:

Mediabot Partyline

Please enter your nickname.

A real nickname was sent:

Te[u]K

and the session correctly advanced into the authentication state:

Enter your password.

No password was sent during the smoke test.

This validates the real runtime path through:

TCP transport
    ↓
session creation
    ↓
nickname parsing
    ↓
session/auth state
    ↓
password prompt

Result:

RC_SMOKE=0

Runtime logs remained clean:

OK: no obvious runtime error

⚑ Fast suite

The complete fast suite passed after the extraction:

PASSED : 5618/5618  (63s)

πŸ§™ Full suite

Final full validation:

PASSED : 14530/14530  (207s)

No tests were removed, hidden or weakened to make the extraction pass.

🧹 Why this matters

Partyline started MB678 as a module of almost seven thousand lines containing several distinct responsibilities.

After the first two MB678 rounds, those responsibilities are already becoming explicit:

Mediabot/Partyline.pm
    dispatch + commands

Mediabot/Partyline/Transport.pm
    TCP / DCC transport

Mediabot/Partyline/SessionAuth.pm
    session lifecycle + authentication

This is more than moving code between files.

Each new boundary corresponds to a real runtime responsibility and has its own regression contract.

That makes Partyline easier to understand, safer to change and much easier to bisect if a future regression ever appears.

The password has not changed.

It simply has a much better guarded chamber now. πŸ”

πŸ“¦ Commit

Version : 3.4dev-20260820_154710
Commit  : a81729b

πŸ” Give Partyline Sessions Their Own Chamber Without Changing the Password

You must be logged in to reply.